Dynamic Modelling of Pathways to Cellular Senescence Reveals Strategies for Targeted Interventions
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 10, Issue: 8, Page: e1003728
2014
- 121Citations
- 184Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations121
- Citation Indexes121
- 121
- CrossRef22
- Captures184
- Readers184
- 184
Article Description
Cellular senescence, a state of irreversible cell cycle arrest, is thought to help protect an organism from cancer, yet also contributes to ageing. The changes which occur in senescence are controlled by networks of multiple signalling and feedback pathways at the cellular level, and the interplay between these is difficult to predict and understand. To unravel the intrinsic challenges of understanding such a highly networked system, we have taken a systems biology approach to cellular senescence. We report a detailed analysis of senescence signalling via DNA damage, insulin-TOR, FoxO3a transcription factors, oxidative stress response, mitochondrial regulation and mitophagy. We show in silico and in vitro that inhibition of reactive oxygen species can prevent loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, whilst inhibition of mTOR shows a partial rescue of mitochondrial mass changes during establishment of senescence. Dual inhibition of ROS and mTOR in vitro confirmed computational model predictions that it was possible to further reduce senescence-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and DNA double-strand breaks. However, these interventions were unable to abrogate the senescence-induced mitochondrial dysfunction completely, and we identified decreased mitochondrial fission as the potential driving force for increased mitochondrial mass via prevention of mitophagy. Dynamic sensitivity analysis of the model showed the network stabilised at a new late state of cellular senescence. This was characterised by poor network sensitivity, high signalling noise, low cellular energy, high inflammation and permanent cell cycle arrest suggesting an unsatisfactory outcome for treatments aiming to delay or reverse cellular senescence at late time points. Combinatorial targeted interventions are therefore possible for intervening in the cellular pathway to senescence, but in the cases identified here, are only capable of delaying senescence onset.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g007; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.t001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g006; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84926469999&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25166345; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g005; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g006; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.t001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g007; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g003; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728&type=printable; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25166345; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4159174; http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.t001; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1003728; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003728.g004
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know