Simulation and Theory of Antibody Binding to Crowded Antigen-Covered Surfaces
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 12, Issue: 3, Page: e1004752
2016
- 47Citations
- 113Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations47
- Citation Indexes47
- 47
- CrossRef25
- Captures113
- Readers113
- 113
Article Description
In this paper we introduce a fully flexible coarse-grained model of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies parametrized directly on cryo-EM data and simulate the binding dynamics of many IgGs to antigens adsorbed on a surface at increasing densities. Moreover, we work out a theoretical model that allows to explain all the features observed in the simulations. Our combined computational and theoretical framework is in excellent agreement with surface-plasmon resonance data and allows us to establish a number of important results. (i) Internal flexibility is key to maximize bivalent binding, flexible IgGs being able to explore the surface with their second arm in search for an available hapten. This is made clear by the strongly reduced ability to bind with both arms displayed by artificial IgGs designed to rigidly keep a prescribed shape. (ii) The large size of IgGs is instrumental to keep neighboring molecules at a certain distance (surface repulsion), which essentially makes antigens within reach of the second Fab always unoccupied on average. (iii) One needs to account independently for the thermodynamic and geometric factors that regulate the binding equilibrium. The key geometrical parameters, besides excluded-volume repulsion, describe the screening of free haptens by neighboring bound antibodies. We prove that the thermodynamic parameters govern the low-antigen-concentration regime, while the surface screening and repulsion only affect the binding at high hapten densities. Importantly, we prove that screening effects are concealed in relative measures, such as the fraction of bivalently bound antibodies. Overall, our model provides a valuable, accurate theoretical paradigm beyond existing frameworks to interpret experimental profiles of antibodies binding to multi-valent surfaces of different sorts in many contexts.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g006; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g005; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g007; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84962109465&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26967624; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.t001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g007; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g006; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g005; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752.t001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know