A Likelihood Approach for Real-Time Calibration of Stochastic Compartmental Epidemic Models
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: e1005257
2017
- 15Citations
- 57Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef5
- Captures57
- Readers57
- 57
Article Description
Stochastic transmission dynamic models are especially useful for studying the early emergence of novel pathogens given the importance of chance events when the number of infectious individuals is small. However, methods for parameter estimation and prediction for these types of stochastic models remain limited. In this manuscript, we describe a calibration and prediction framework for stochastic compartmental transmission models of epidemics. The proposed method, Multiple Shooting for Stochastic systems (MSS), applies a linear noise approximation to describe the size of the fluctuations, and uses each new surveillance observation to update the belief about the true epidemic state. Using simulated outbreaks of a novel viral pathogen, we evaluate the accuracy of MSS for real-time parameter estimation and prediction during epidemics. We assume that weekly counts for the number of new diagnosed cases are available and serve as an imperfect proxy of incidence. We show that MSS produces accurate estimates of key epidemic parameters (i.e. mean duration of infectiousness, R, and R) and can provide an accurate estimate of the unobserved number of infectious individuals during the course of an epidemic. MSS also allows for accurate prediction of the number and timing of future hospitalizations and the overall attack rate. We compare the performance of MSS to three state-of-the-art benchmark methods: 1) a likelihood approximation with an assumption of independent Poisson observations; 2) a particle filtering method; and 3) an ensemble Kalman filter method. We find that MSS significantly outperforms each of these three benchmark methods in the majority of epidemic scenarios tested. In summary, MSS is a promising method that may improve on current approaches for calibration and prediction using stochastic models of epidemics.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g006; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g005; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85011362770&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095403; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g006; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g005; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g001; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g006; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005257.g002; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1005257
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know