Limits on amplifiers of natural selection under death-Birth updating
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 16, Issue: 1, Page: e1007494
2020
- 44Citations
- 20Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations44
- Citation Indexes44
- 44
- CrossRef23
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
Whose name is written on water.
□ Miraculix: Efficient Calculation of the Genomic Relationship Matrix >> https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.12.903146v1.full.pdf a sequence of distinct algorithms that differ in their speed-up and their SIMD requirements: TwoBit (15×; SIMD not used), Packed (28×; SSE2); Shuffle (35×; SSSE3). Since the calculation of a genomic relationship matrix needs a large number of arithmetic oper
Article Description
The fixation probability of a single mutant invading a population of residents is among the most widely-studied quantities in evolutionary dynamics. Amplifiers of natural selection are population structures that increase the fixation probability of advantageous mutants, compared to well-mixed populations. Extensive studies have shown that many amplifiers exist for the Birth-death Moran process, some of them substantially increasing the fixation probability or even guaranteeing fixation in the limit of large population size. On the other hand, no amplifiers are known for the death-Birth Moran process, and computer-assisted exhaustive searches have failed to discover amplification. In this work we resolve this disparity, by showing that any amplification under death-Birth updating is necessarily bounded and transient. Our boundedness result states that even if a population structure does amplify selection, the resulting fixation probability is close to that of the well-mixed population. Our transience result states that for any population structure there exists a threshold r such that the population structure ceases to amplify selection if the mutant fitness advantage r is larger than r. Finally, we also extend the above results to δ-death-Birth updating, which is a combination of Birth-death and death-Birth updating. On the positive side, we identify population structures that maintain amplification for a wide range of values r and δ. These results demonstrate that amplification of natural selection depends on the specific mechanisms of the evolutionary process.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g005; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g006
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077983849&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31951609; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g006; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g005; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494.g005; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007494&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know