A mesoscopic simulator to uncover heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics in tumors
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 17, Issue: 2, Page: e1008266
2021
- 11Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef6
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
Increasingly complex in silico modeling approaches offer a way to simultaneously access cancerous processes at different spatio-temporal scales. High-level models, such as those based on partial differential equations, are computationally affordable and allow large tumor sizes and long temporal windows to be studied, but miss the discrete nature of many key underlying cellular processes. Individual-based approaches provide a much more detailed description of tumors, but have difficulties when trying to handle full-sized real cancers. Thus, there exists a trade-off between the integration of macroscopic and microscopic information, now widely available, and the ability to attain clinical tumor sizes. In this paper we put forward a stochastic mesoscopic simulation framework that incorporates key cellular processes during tumor progression while keeping computational costs to a minimum. Our framework captures a physical scale that allows both the incorporation of microscopic information, tracking the spatio-temporal emergence of tumor heterogeneity and the underlying evolutionary dynamics, and the reconstruction of clinically sized tumors from high-resolution medical imaging data, with the additional benefit of low computational cost. We illustrate the functionality of our modeling approach for the case of glioblastoma, a paradigm of tumor heterogeneity that remains extremely challenging in the clinical setting.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g008; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g006; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g007; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g005; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g009; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.t001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102216141&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33566821; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g008; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g009; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g007; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g009; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g009; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g005; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g008; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.t001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g006; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266.g006; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008266&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know