The fitness landscapes of cis-Acting binding sites in different promoter and environmental contexts
PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7404, Vol: 6, Issue: 7, Page: 1-14
2010
- 26Citations
- 94Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef15
- Captures94
- Readers94
- 94
Article Description
The biophysical nature of the interaction between a transcription factor and its target sequences in vitro is sufficiently well understood to allow for the effects of DNA sequence alterations on affinity to be predicted. But even in relatively simple in vivo systems, the complexities of promoter organization and activity have made it difficult to predict how altering specific interactions between a transcription factor and DNA will affect promoter output. To better understand this, we measured the relative fitness of nearly all Escherichia coli σ -35 binding sites in different promoter and environmental contexts by competing four randomized {35 promoter libraries controlling the expression of the tetracycline resistance gene (tet) against each other in increasing concentrations of drug. We sequenced populations after competition to determine the relative enrichment of each -35 sequence. We observed a consistent relationship between the frequency of recovery of each -35 binding site and its predicted affinity for σ that varied depending on the sequence context of the promoter and drug concentration. Overall the relative fitness of each promoter could be predicted by a simple thermodynamic model of transcriptional regulation, in which the rate of transcriptional initiation (and hence fitness) is dependent upon the overall stability of the initiation complex, which in turn is dependent upon the energetic contributions of all sites within the complex. As implied by this model, a decrease in the free energy of association at one site could be compensated for by an increase in the binding energy at another to produce a similar output. Furthermore, these data show that a large and continuous range of transcriptional outputs can be accessed by merely changing the -35, suggesting that evolved or engineered mutations at this site could allow for subtle and precise control over gene expression. © 2010 Shultzaberger et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g008; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g005; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g003; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g006; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g007; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957357763&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20686658; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g008; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g008; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g008; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1001042; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001042&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know