Mechanisms Employed by Escherichia coli to Prevent Ribonucleotide Incorporation into Genomic DNA by Pol V
PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7390, Vol: 8, Issue: 11, Page: e1003030
2012
- 35Citations
- 52Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef31
- Captures52
- Readers52
- 52
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
Escherichia coli pol V (UmuD′C), the main translesion DNA polymerase, ensures continued nascent strand extension when the cellular replicase is blocked by unrepaired DNA lesions. Pol V is characterized by low sugar selectivity, which can be further reduced by a Y11A "steric-gate" substitution in UmuC that enables pol V to preferentially incorporate rNTPs over dNTPs in vitro. Despite efficient error-prone translesion synthesis catalyzed by UmuC_Y11A in vitro, strains expressing umuC_Y11A exhibit low UV mutability and UV resistance. Here, we show that these phenotypes result from the concomitant dual actions of Ribonuclease HII (RNase HII) initiating removal of rNMPs from the nascent DNA strand and nucleotide excision repair (NER) removing UV lesions from the parental strand. In the absence of either repair pathway, UV resistance and mutagenesis conferred by umuC_Y11A is significantly enhanced, suggesting that the combined actions of RNase HII and NER lead to double-strand breaks that result in reduced cell viability. We present evidence that the Y11A-specific UV phenotype is tempered by pol IV in vivo. At physiological ratios of the two polymerases, pol IV inhibits pol V-catalyzed translesion synthesis (TLS) past UV lesions and significantly reduces the number of Y11A-incorporated rNTPs by limiting the length of the pol V-dependent TLS tract generated during lesion bypass in vitro. In a recA730 lexA(Def) ΔumuDC ΔdinB strain, plasmid-encoded wild-type pol V promotes high levels of spontaneous mutagenesis. However, umuC_Y11A-dependent spontaneous mutagenesis is only ~7% of that observed with wild-type pol V, but increases to ~39% of wild-type levels in an isogenic ΔrnhB strain and ~72% of wild-type levels in a ΔrnhA ΔrnhB double mutant. Our observations suggest that errant ribonucleotides incorporated by pol V can be tolerated in the E. coli genome, but at the cost of higher levels of cellular mutagenesis.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g005; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g004; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g006; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.t001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84870714773&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144626; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g004; http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g006; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1003030; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003030.g005
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know