The Genetic Architecture of Natural Variation in Recombination Rate in Drosophila melanogaster
PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7404, Vol: 12, Issue: 4, Page: e1005951
2016
- 94Citations
- 125Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations94
- Citation Indexes94
- CrossRef94
- 81
- Captures125
- Readers125
- 125
Article Description
Meiotic recombination ensures proper chromosome segregation in many sexually reproducing organisms. Despite this crucial function, rates of recombination are highly variable within and between taxa, and the genetic basis of this variation remains poorly understood. Here, we exploit natural variation in the inbred, sequenced lines of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) to map genetic variants affecting recombination rate. We used a two-step crossing scheme and visible markers to measure rates of recombination in a 33 cM interval on the X chromosome and in a 20.4 cM interval on chromosome 3R for 205 DGRP lines. Though we cannot exclude that some biases exist due to viability effects associated with the visible markers used in this study, we find ~2-fold variation in recombination rate among lines. Interestingly, we further find that recombination rates are uncorrelated between the two chromosomal intervals. We performed a genome-wide association study to identify genetic variants associated with recombination rate in each of the two intervals surveyed. We refined our list of candidate variants and genes associated with recombination rate variation and selected twenty genes for functional assessment. We present strong evidence that five genes are likely to contribute to natural variation in recombination rate in D. melanogaster; these genes lie outside the canonical meiotic recombination pathway. We also find a weak effect of Wolbachia infection on recombination rate and we confirm the interchromosomal effect. Our results highlight the magnitude of population variation in recombination rate present in D. melanogaster and implicate new genetic factors mediating natural variation in this quantitative trait.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t003; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g004; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g005; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g003; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84964832412&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27035832; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g005; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1005951; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005951
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know