CDI Systems Are Stably Maintained by a Cell-Contact Mediated Surveillance Mechanism
PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7404, Vol: 12, Issue: 6, Page: e1006145
2016
- 19Citations
- 48Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef16
- Captures48
- Readers48
- 48
Article Description
Contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems are widespread amongst Gram-negative bacteria where they play important roles in inter-cellular competition and biofilm formation. CDI bacteria use cell-surface CdiA proteins to bind neighboring bacteria and deliver C-terminal toxin domains. CDI cells also express CdiI immunity proteins that specifically neutralize toxins delivered from adjacent siblings. Genomic analyses indicate that cdi loci are commonly found on plasmids and genomic islands, suggesting that these Type 5 secretion systems are spread through horizontal gene transfer. Here, we examine whether CDI toxin and immunity activities serve to stabilize mobile genetic elements using a minimal F plasmid that fails to partition properly during cell division. This F plasmid is lost from Escherichia coli populations within 50 cell generations, but is maintained in ~60% of the cells after 100 generations when the plasmid carries the cdi gene cluster from E. coli strain EC93. By contrast, the ccdAB "plasmid addiction" module normally found on F exerts only a modest stabilizing effect. cdi-dependent plasmid stabilization requires the BamA receptor for CdiA, suggesting that plasmid-free daughter cells are inhibited by siblings that retain the CDI plasmid. In support of this model, the CDI F plasmid is lost rapidly from cells that carry an additional cdiI immunity gene on a separate plasmid. These results indicate that plasmid stabilization occurs through elimination of non-immune cells arising in the population via plasmid loss. Thus, genetic stabilization reflects a strong selection for immunity to CDI. After long-term passage for more than 300 generations, CDI plasmids acquire mutations that increase copy number and result in 100% carriage in the population. Together, these results show that CDI stabilizes genetic elements through a toxin-mediated surveillance mechanism in which cells that lose the CDI system are detected and eliminated by their siblings.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g006; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g004; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g003; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g005; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g007
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84977546715&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27355474; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1006145; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g006; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006145.g007
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know