PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

A Mutational Hotspot and Strong Selection Contribute to the Order of Mutations Selected for during Escherichia coli Adaptation to the Gut

PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7404, Vol: 12, Issue: 11, Page: e1006420
2016
  • 30
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 72
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 14
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    30
  • Captures
    72
  • Social Media
    14
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      14
      • Facebook
        14

Article Description

The relative role of drift versus selection underlying the evolution of bacterial species within the gut microbiota remains poorly understood. The large sizes of bacterial populations in this environment suggest that even adaptive mutations with weak effects, thought to be the most frequently occurring, could substantially contribute to a rapid pace of evolutionary change in the gut. We followed the emergence of intra-species diversity in a commensal Escherichia coli strain that previously acquired an adaptive mutation with strong effect during one week of colonization of the mouse gut. Following this first step, which consisted of inactivating a metabolic operon, one third of the subsequent adaptive mutations were found to have a selective effect as high as the first. Nevertheless, the order of the adaptive steps was strongly affected by a mutational hotspot with an exceptionally high mutation rate of 10. The pattern of polymorphism emerging in the populations evolving within different hosts was characterized by periodic selection, which reduced diversity, but also frequency-dependent selection, actively maintaining genetic diversity. Furthermore, the continuous emergence of similar phenotypes due to distinct mutations, known as clonal interference, was pervasive. Evolutionary change within the gut is therefore highly repeatable within and across hosts, with adaptive mutations of selection coefficients as strong as 12% accumulating without strong constraints on genetic background. In vivo competitive assays showed that one of the second steps (focA) exhibited positive epistasis with the first, while another (dcuB) exhibited negative epistasis. The data shows that strong effect adaptive mutations continuously recur in gut commensal bacterial species.

Bibliographic Details

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85000644795&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812114; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005

Marta Lourenço; Ricardo S. Ramiro; Daniela Güleresi; João Barroso-Batista; Karina B. Xavier; Isabel Gordo; Ana Sousa; Tim F Cooper

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Medicine

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know