A Mutational Hotspot and Strong Selection Contribute to the Order of Mutations Selected for during Escherichia coli Adaptation to the Gut
PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7404, Vol: 12, Issue: 11, Page: e1006420
2016
- 30Citations
- 72Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef24
- Captures72
- Readers72
- 72
Article Description
The relative role of drift versus selection underlying the evolution of bacterial species within the gut microbiota remains poorly understood. The large sizes of bacterial populations in this environment suggest that even adaptive mutations with weak effects, thought to be the most frequently occurring, could substantially contribute to a rapid pace of evolutionary change in the gut. We followed the emergence of intra-species diversity in a commensal Escherichia coli strain that previously acquired an adaptive mutation with strong effect during one week of colonization of the mouse gut. Following this first step, which consisted of inactivating a metabolic operon, one third of the subsequent adaptive mutations were found to have a selective effect as high as the first. Nevertheless, the order of the adaptive steps was strongly affected by a mutational hotspot with an exceptionally high mutation rate of 10. The pattern of polymorphism emerging in the populations evolving within different hosts was characterized by periodic selection, which reduced diversity, but also frequency-dependent selection, actively maintaining genetic diversity. Furthermore, the continuous emergence of similar phenotypes due to distinct mutations, known as clonal interference, was pervasive. Evolutionary change within the gut is therefore highly repeatable within and across hosts, with adaptive mutations of selection coefficients as strong as 12% accumulating without strong constraints on genetic background. In vivo competitive assays showed that one of the second steps (focA) exhibited positive epistasis with the first, while another (dcuB) exhibited negative epistasis. The data shows that strong effect adaptive mutations continuously recur in gut commensal bacterial species.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85000644795&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812114; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006420.g005
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know