Human Oocyte-Derived Methylation Differences Persist in the Placenta Revealing Widespread Transient Imprinting
PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7404, Vol: 12, Issue: 11, Page: e1006427
2016
- 83Citations
- 116Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations83
- Citation Indexes83
- 83
- CrossRef36
- Captures116
- Readers116
- 116
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
Transient Imprinting of Genes in the Human Placenta
When the fertilization occurs, the maternal and paternal pronuclei have thousands of opposite methylated regions. Most of this germline methylation are resolved during the postfertilization epigenetic reprogramming by active mechanism for the sperm-derived methylated regions and depending on DNA replication for the oocyte-derived ones. There is a subset of regions that are known to avoid this deme
Article Description
Thousands of regions in gametes have opposing methylation profiles that are largely resolved during the post-fertilization epigenetic reprogramming. However some specific sequences associated with imprinted loci survive this demethylation process. Here we present the data describing the fate of germline-derived methylation in humans. With the exception of a few known paternally methylated germline differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with known imprinted domains, we demonstrate that sperm-derived methylation is reprogrammed by the blastocyst stage of development. In contrast a large number of oocyte-derived methylation differences survive to the blastocyst stage and uniquely persist as transiently methylated DMRs only in the placenta. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this phenomenon is exclusive to primates, since no placenta-specific maternal methylation was observed in mouse. Utilizing single cell RNA-seq datasets from human preimplantation embryos we show that following embryonic genome activation the maternally methylated transient DMRs can orchestrate imprinted expression. However despite showing widespread imprinted expression of genes in placenta, allele-specific transcriptional profiling revealed that not all placenta-specific DMRs coordinate imprinted expression and that this maternal methylation may be absent in a minority of samples, suggestive of polymorphic imprinted methylation.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g004; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g003; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g005; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g006; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85000631215&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27835649; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1006427; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006427.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know