The genomic landscape at a late stage of stickleback speciation: High genomic divergence interspersed by small localized regions of introgression
PLoS Genetics, ISSN: 1553-7404, Vol: 14, Issue: 5, Page: e1007358
2018
- 84Citations
- 159Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations84
- Citation Indexes84
- CrossRef84
- 71
- Captures159
- Readers159
- 159
Article Description
Speciation is a continuous process and analysis of species pairs at different stages of divergence provides insight into how it unfolds. Previous genomic studies on young species pairs have revealed peaks of divergence and heterogeneous genomic differentiation. Yet less known is how localised peaks of differentiation progress to genome-wide divergence during the later stages of speciation in the presence of persistent gene flow. Spanning the speciation continuum, stickleback species pairs are ideal for investigating how genomic divergence builds up during speciation. However, attention has largely focused on young postglacial species pairs, with little knowledge of the genomic signatures of divergence and introgression in older stickleback systems. The Japanese stickleback species pair, composed of the Pacific Ocean three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and the Japan Sea stickleback (G. nipponicus), which co-occur in the Japanese islands, is at a late stage of speciation. Divergence likely started well before the end of the last glacial period and crosses between Japan Sea females and Pacific Ocean males result in hybrid male sterility. Here we use coalescent analyses and Approximate Bayesian Computation to show that the two species split approximately 0.68–1 million years ago but that they have continued to exchange genes at a low rate throughout divergence. Population genomic data revealed that, despite gene flow, a high level of genomic differentiation is maintained across the majority of the genome. However, we identified multiple, small regions of introgression, occurring mainly in areas of low recombination rate. Our results demonstrate that a high level of genome-wide divergence can establish in the face of persistent introgression and that gene flow can be localized to small genomic regions at the later stages of speciation with gene flow.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g005; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t002; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t001; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g004; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g003; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048240045&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791436; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007358.g003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know