Muscle-specific adaptations, impaired oxidative capacity and maintenance of contractile function characterize diet-induced obese mouse skeletal muscle
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 4, Issue: 10, Page: e7293
2009
- 95Citations
- 108Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations95
- Citation Indexes95
- 95
- CrossRef74
- Captures108
- Readers108
- 108
Article Description
Background: The effects of diet-induced obesity on skeletal muscle function are largely unknown, particularly as it relates to changes in oxidative metabolism and morphology. Principal Findings: Compared to control fed mice, mice fed a high fat diet (HFD; 60% kcal: fat) for 8 weeks displayed increased body mass and insulin resistance without overt fasting hyperglycemia (i.e. pre-diabetic). Histological analysis revealed a greater oxidative potential in the HFD gastrocnemius/plantaris (increased IIA, reduced IIB fiber-type percentages) and soleus (increased I, IIA cross-sectional areas) muscles, but no change in fiber type percentages in tibialis anterior muscles compared to controls. Intramyocellular lipid levels were significantly increased relative to control in HFD gastrocnemius/ plantaris, but were similar to control values in the HFD soleus. Using a novel, single muscle fiber approach, impairments in complete palmitate and glucose oxidation (72.8±6.6% and 61.8±9.1% of control, respectively; p<0.05) with HFD were detected. These reductions were consistent with measures made using intact extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscles. Compared to controls, no difference in succinate dehydrogenase or citrate synthase enzyme activities were observed between groups in any muscle studied, however, short-chain fatty acyl CoA dehydrogenase (SCHAD) activity was elevated in the HFD soleus, but not tibialis anterior muscles. Despite these morphological and metabolic alterations, no significant difference in peak tetanic force or low-frequency fatigue rates were observed between groups. Conclusions: These findings indicate that HFD induces early adaptive responses that occur in a muscle-specific pattern, but are insufficient to prevent impairments in oxidative metabolism with continued high-fat feeding. Moreover, the morphological and metabolic changes which occur with 8 weeks of HFD do not significantly impact muscle contractile properties. © 2009 Shortreed et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0007293; 10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70350234628&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19806198; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007293&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0007293; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007293.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know