Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α determines gastric cancer chemosensitivity via modulation of p53 and Nf-κB
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 5, Issue: 8, Page: e12038
2010
- 113Citations
- 99Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations113
- Citation Indexes113
- 113
- CrossRef97
- Captures99
- Readers99
- 99
Article Description
Background: Reduced chemosensitivity of solid cancer cells represents a pivotal obstacle in clinical oncology. Hence, the molecular characterization of pathways regulating chemosensitivity is a central prerequisite to improve cancer therapy. The hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1α has been linked to chemosensitivity while the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely elusive. Therefore, we comprehensively analysed HIF-1α's role in determining chemosensitivity focussing on responsible molecular pathways. Methodology and Principal Findings: RNA interference was applied to inactivate HIF-1α or p53 in the human gastric cancer cell lines AGS and MKN28. The chemotherapeutic agents 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin were used and chemosensitivity was assessed by cell proliferation assays as well as determination of cell cycle distribution and apoptosis. Expression of p53 and p53 target proteins was analyzed by western blot. NF-κB activity was characterized by means of electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Inactivation of HIF-1α in gastric cancer cells resulted in robust elevation of chemosensitivity. Accordingly, HIF-1α-competent cells displayed a significant reduction of chemotherapy-induced senescence and apoptosis. Remarkably, this phenotype was completely absent in p53 mutant cells while inactivation of p53 per se did not affect chemosensitivity. HIF-1α markedly suppressed chemotherapy-induced activation of p53 and p21 as well as the retinoblastoma protein, eventually resulting in cell cycle arrest. Reduced formation of reactive oxygen species in HIF-1α-competent cells was identified as the molecular mechanism of HIF-1α-mediated inhibition of p53. Furthermore, loss of HIF-1α abrogated, in a p53-dependent manner, chemotherapy-induced DNA-binding of NF-κB and expression of anti-apoptotic NF-κB target genes. Accordingly, reconstitution of the NF-κB subunit p65 reversed the increased chemosensitivity of HIF-1α-deficient cells. Conclusion and Significance: In summary, we identified HIF-1α as a potent regulator of p53 and NF-κB activity under conditions of genotoxic stress. We conclude that p53 mutations in human tumors hold the potential to confound the efficacy of HIF-1-inhibitors in cancer therapy. © 2010 Rohwer et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0012038; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957786826&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20706634; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0012038; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012038; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012038
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know