Akt deficiency attenuates muscle size and function but not the response to ActRIIB inhibition
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 5, Issue: 9, Page: 1-12
2010
- 54Citations
- 60Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations54
- Citation Indexes54
- 54
- CrossRef51
- Captures60
- Readers60
- 60
Article Description
Background: Akt is a critical mediator of developmental skeletal muscle growth. Treatment with a soluble ActRIIB fusion protein (ActRIIB-mFc) increases skeletal muscle mass and strength by inhibiting myostatin and related peptides. Recent in vitro studies have suggested that Akt signaling is necessary for the ability of ActRIIB inhibition to induce muscle hypertrophy. Thus, we hypothesized that mice deficient in either Akt1 or Akt2 would not respond to in vivo inhibition of ActRIIB with ActRIIB-mFc treatment. Methodology and Principal Findings: We analyzed body composition and muscle parameters in wild-type C57BL/6J and Akt1 and Akt2 knockout mice, and compared the responses to blockade of ActRIIB signaling via ActRIIB-mFc treatment. Mice lacking Akt1 or Akt2 had reduced muscle mass, grip strength and contractile force. However, deficiency of Akt1 or Akt2 did not prevent the ability of ActRIIB-mFc treatment to induce muscle hypertrophy, or increase grip strength and contractile force. Akt1 and Akt2 deficient mice responded similarly as wild type mice to ActRIIB-mFc treatment by increasing fiber size. Conclusions and Significance: Akt1 and Akt2 are important for the regulation of skeletal muscle mass and function. However, these Akt isoforms are not essential for the ability of ActRIIB inhibition to regulate muscle size, fiber type, strength or contractile force. © 2010 Goncalves et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0012707; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g008; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958537905&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20856813; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g008; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g008; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g008; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g008; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g007; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0012707; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0012707; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012707.g006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know