Global patterns of guild composition and functional diversity of spiders
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 6, Issue: 6, Page: e21710
2011
- 415Citations
- 560Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations415
- Citation Indexes413
- 413
- CrossRef166
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures560
- Readers560
- 560
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Diversidad taxonómica de Thomisidae (Araneae) en ambientes heterogéneos del sitio Ramsar Humedales Chaco, Argentina/Taxonomic diversity of Thomisidae (Araneae) in heterogeneous environments of the Ramsar site Chaco Wetlands, Argentina.(ECOLOGIA)
INTRODUCCIÓN Los Humedales del Chaco argentino, declarados Sitio Ramsar (denominado de ese modo porque en Ramsar, Irán, fue firmada por primera vez la Convención Relativa
Article Description
The objectives of this work are: (1) to define spider guilds for all extant families worldwide; (2) test if guilds defined at family level are good surrogates of species guilds; (3) compare the taxonomic and guild composition of spider assemblages from different parts of the world; (4) compare the taxonomic and functional diversity of spider assemblages and; (5) relate functional diversity with habitat structure. Data on foraging strategy, prey range, vertical stratification and circadian activity was collected for 108 families. Spider guilds were defined by hierarchical clustering. We searched for inconsistencies between family guild placement and the known guild of each species. Richness and abundance per guild before and after correcting guild placement were compared, as were the proportions of each guild and family between all possible pairs of sites. Functional diversity per site was calculated based on hierarchical clustering. Eight guilds were discriminated: (1) sensing, (2) sheet, (3) space, and (4) orb web weavers; (5) specialists; (6) ambush, (7) ground, and (8) other hunters. Sixteen percent of the species richness corresponding to 11% of all captured individuals was incorrectly attributed to a guild by family surrogacy; however, the correlation of uncorrected vs. corrected guilds was invariably high. The correlation of guild richness or abundances was generally higher than the correlation of family richness or abundances. Functional diversity was not always higher in the tropics than in temperate regions. Families may potentially serve as ecological surrogates for species. Different families may present similar roles in the ecosystems, with replacement of some taxa by other within the same guild. Spiders in tropical regions seem to have higher redundancy of functional roles and/or finer resource partitioning than in temperate regions. Although species and family diversity were higher in the tropics, functional diversity seems to be also influenced by altitude and habitat structure.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0021710; 10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79959682118&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21738772; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710; http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0021710; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021710&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0021710; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g001; http://alm.plos.org/articles/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know