Vapa, an innovative "virus-acquisition phenotyping assay" opens new horizons in research into the vector-transmission of plant viruses
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 6, Issue: 8, Page: e23241
2011
- 10Citations
- 32Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef7
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
Article Description
Host-to-host transmission-a key step in plant virus infection cycles-is ensured predominantly by vectors, especially aphids and related insects. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms of virus acquisition, which is critical to vector-transmission, might help to design future virus control strategies, because any newly discovered molecular or cellular process is a potential target for hampering viral spread within host populations. With this aim in mind, an aphid membrane-feeding assay was developed where aphids transmitted two non-circulative viruses [cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) and turnip mosaic virus] from infected protoplasts. In this assay, virus acquisition occurs exclusively from living cells. Most interestingly, we also show that CaMV is less efficiently transmitted by aphids in the presence of oryzalin-a microtubule-depolymerising drug. The example presented here demonstrates that our technically simple "virus-acquisition phenotyping assay" (VAPA) provides a first opportunity to implement correlative studies relating the physiological state of infected plant cells to vector-transmission efficiency. © 2011 Martinière et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0023241; 10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80051500194&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21853093; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023241; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023241&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023241&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023241; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0023241; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023241.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know