Humoral and cellular cmv responses in healthy donors; identification of a frequent population of CMV-specific, CD4+ T cells in seronegative donors
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 7, Issue: 2, Page: e31420
2012
- 17Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef13
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Article Description
CMV status is an important risk factor in immune compromised patients. In hematopoeitic cell transplantations (HCT), both donor and recipient are tested routinely for CMV status by serological assays; however, one might argue that it might also be of relevance to examine CMV status by cellular (i.e., T lymphocyte) assays. Here, we have analyzed the CMV status of 100 healthy blood bank donors using both serology and cellular assays. About half (56%) were found to be CMV seropositive, and they all mounted strong CD8+ and/or moderate CD4+ T cell responses ex vivo against the immunodominant CMV protein, pp65. Of the 44 seronegative donors, only five (11%) mounted ex vivo T cell responses; surprisingly, 33 (75%) mounted strong CD4+ T cell responses after a brief in vitro peptide stimulation culture. This may have significant implications for the analysis and selection of HCT donors. © 2012 Loeth et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0031420; 10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856702229&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347475; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031420; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031420; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031420&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031420; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031420; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031420&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know