Intraspecific correlations of basal and maximal metabolic rates in birds and the aerobic capacity model for the evolution of endothermy
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 7, Issue: 3, Page: e34271
2012
- 46Citations
- 79Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations46
- Citation Indexes46
- 46
- CrossRef41
- Captures79
- Readers79
- 79
Article Description
The underlying assumption of the aerobic capacity model for the evolution of endothermy is that basal (BMR) and maximal aerobic metabolic rates are phenotypically linked. However, because BMR is largely a function of central organs whereas maximal metabolic output is largely a function of skeletal muscles, the mechanistic underpinnings for their linkage are not obvious. Interspecific studies in birds generally support a phenotypic correlation between BMR and maximal metabolic output. If the aerobic capacity model is valid, these phenotypic correlations should also extend to intraspecific comparisons. We measured BMR, M (maximum thermoregulatory metabolic rate) and MMR (maximum exercise metabolic rate in a hop-flutter chamber) in winter for dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis), American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis; M and MMR only), and black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus; BMR and M only) and examined correlations among these variables. We also measured BMR and M in individual house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in both summer, winter and spring. For both raw metabolic rates and residuals from allometric regressions, BMR was not significantly correlated with either M or MMR in juncos. Moreover, no significant correlation between M and MMR or their mass-independent residuals occurred for juncos or goldfinches. Raw BMR and M were significantly positively correlated for black-capped chickadees and house sparrows, but mass-independent residuals of BMR and M were not. These data suggest that central organ and exercise organ metabolic levels are not inextricably linked and that muscular capacities for exercise and shivering do not necessarily vary in tandem in individual birds. Why intraspecific and interspecific avian studies show differing results and the significance of these differences to the aerobic capacity model are unknown, and resolution of these questions will require additional studies of potential mechanistic links between minimal and maximal metabolic output. © 2012 Swanson et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0034271; 10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g006
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84858962936&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479584; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034271; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g005; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0034271; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034271
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know