Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I E-Peptide Activity Is Dependent on the IGF-I Receptor
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 7, Issue: 9, Page: e45588
2012
- 42Citations
- 32Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations42
- Citation Indexes42
- 42
- CrossRef19
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
Article Description
Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is an essential growth factor that regulates the processes necessary for cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The Igf1 gene encodes mature IGF-I and a carboxy-terminal extension called the E-peptide. In rodents, alternative splicing and post-translational processing produce two E-peptides (EA and EB). EB has been studied extensively and has been reported to promote cell proliferation and migration independently of IGF-I and its receptor (IGF-IR), but the mechanism by which EB causes these actions has not been identified. Further, the properties of EA have not been evaluated. Therefore, the goals of this study were to determine if EA and EB possessed similar activity and if these actions were IGF-IR independent. We utilized synthetic peptides for EA, EB, and a scrambled control to examine cellular responses. Both E-peptides increased MAPK signaling, which was blocked by pharmacologic IGF-IR inhibition. Although the E-peptides did not directly induce IGF-IR phosphorylation, the presence of either E-peptide increased IGF-IR activation by IGF-I, and this was achieved through enhanced cell surface bioavailability of the receptor. To determine if E-peptide biological actions required the IGF-IR, we took advantage of the murine C2C12 cell line as a platform to examine the key steps of skeletal muscle proliferation, migration and differentiation. EB increased myoblast proliferation and migration while EA delayed differentiation. The proliferation and migration effects were inhibited by MAPK or IGF-IR signaling blockade. Thus, in contrast to previous studies, we find that E-peptide signaling, mitogenic, and motogenic effects are dependent upon IGF-IR. We propose that the E-peptides have little independent activity, but instead affect growth via modulating IGF-I signaling, thereby increasing the complexity of IGF-I biological activity. © 2012 Brisson, Barton.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; 10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g006
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84866650675&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23029120; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0045588; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g006; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045588.g005
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know