Characterizing the Radioresponse of Pluripotent and Multipotent Human Stem Cells
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 7, Issue: 12, Page: e50048
2012
- 41Citations
- 50Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations41
- Citation Indexes41
- 38
- CrossRef25
- Captures50
- Readers50
- 50
Article Description
The potential capability of stem cells to restore functionality to diseased or aged tissues has prompted a surge of research, but much work remains to elucidate the response of these cells to genotoxic agents. To more fully understand the impact of irradiation on different stem cell types, the present study has analyzed the radioresponse of human pluripotent and multipotent stem cells. Human embryonic stem (ES) cells, human induced pluripotent (iPS) cells, and iPS-derived human neural stem cells (iPS-hNSCs) cells were irradiated and analyzed for cell survival parameters, differentiation, DNA damage and repair and oxidative stress at various times after exposure. While irradiation led to dose-dependent reductions in survival, the fraction of surviving cells exhibited dose-dependent increases in metabolic activity. Irradiation did not preclude germ layer commitment of ES cells, but did promote neuronal differentiation. ES cells subjected to irradiation exhibited early apoptosis and inhibition of cell cycle progression, but otherwise showed normal repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Cells surviving irradiation also showed acute and persistent increases in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that were significant at nearly all post-irradiation times analyzed. We suggest that stem cells alter their redox homeostasis to adapt to adverse conditions and that radiation-induced oxidative stress plays a role in regulating the function and fate of stem cells within tissues compromised by radiation injury.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; 10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g005; 10.3410/f.718135538.793484908; 10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871297777&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23272054; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g005; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/718135538#eval793484908; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.718135538.793484908; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0050048; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050048.g003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know