Genetic Variations in the Transforming Growth Factor Beta Pathway as Predictors of Bladder Cancer Risk
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 7, Issue: 12, Page: e51758
2012
- 19Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef12
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the United States, and identifying genetic markers that may predict susceptibility in high-risk population is always needed. The purpose of our study is to determine whether genetic variations in the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) pathway are associated with bladder cancer risk. We identified 356 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 37 key genes from this pathway and evaluated their association with cancer risk in 801 cases and 801 controls. Forty-one SNPs were significantly associated with cancer risk, and after adjusting for multiple comparisons, 9 remained significant (Q-value ≤0.1). Haplotype analysis further revealed three haplotypes within VEGFC and two haplotypes in EGFR were significantly associated with increased bladder cancer risk compared to the most common haplotype. Classification and regression tree analysis further revealed potential high-order gene-gene interactions, with VEGFC: rs3775194 being the initial split, which suggests that this variant is responsible for the most variation in risk. Individuals carrying the common genotype for VEGFC: rs3775194 and EGFR: rs7799627 and the variant genotype for VEGFR: rs4557213 had a 4.22-fold increase in risk, a much larger effect magnitude than that conferred by common genotype for VEGFR: rs4557213. Our study provides the first epidemiological evidence supporting a connection between TGF-β pathway variants and bladder cancer risk. © 2012 Wei et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0051758; 10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871249546&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23251617; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758.t005; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0051758; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051758; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051758&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know