Low Rate of Pandemic A/H1N1 2009 Influenza Infection and Lack of Severe Complication of Vaccination in Pregnant Women: A Prospective Cohort Study
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 7, Issue: 12, Page: e52303
2012
- 29Citations
- 65Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations29
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef24
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Captures65
- Readers65
- 65
Article Description
Background: In 2009, pregnant women were specifically targeted by a national vaccination campaign against pandemic A/H1N1 influenza virus. The objectives of the COFLUPREG study, initially set up to assess the incidence of serious forms of A/H1N1 influenza, were to assess the consequences of maternal vaccination on pregnancy outcomes and maternal seroprotection at delivery. Methods: Pregnant women, between 12 and 35 weeks of gestation, non vaccinated against A/H1N1 2009 influenza were randomly selected to be included in a prospective cohort study conducted in three maternity centers in Paris (France) during pandemic period. Blood samples were planned to assess hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody against A/H1N1 2009 influenza at inclusion and at delivery. Results: Among the 877 pregnant women included in the study, 678 (77.3%) had serum samples both at inclusion and delivery, and 320 (36.5%) received pandemic A/H1N1 2009 influenza vaccine with a median interval between vaccination and delivery of 92 days (95% CI 48-134). At delivery, the proportion of women with seroprotection (HI antibodies titers against A/H1N1 2009 influenza of 1:40 or greater) was 69.9% in vaccinated women. Of the 422 non-vaccinated women with serological data, 11 (2.6%; 95%CI: 1.3-4.6) had laboratory documented A/H1N1 2009 influenza (1 with positive PCR and 10 with serological seroconversion). None of the 877 study's women was hospitalized for flu. No difference on pregnancy outcomes was evidenced between vaccinated women, non-vaccinated women without seroconversion and non-vaccinated women with flu. Conclusion: Despite low vaccine coverage, incidence of pandemic flu was low in this cohort of pregnant women.No effect on pregnancy and delivery outcomes was evidenced after vaccination. © 2012 Launay et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0052303; 10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871641295&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300637; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052303; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052303; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052303&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0052303; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303.t003; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0052303; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052303&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know