Winning Isn't Everything: Mood and Testosterone Regulate the Cortisol Response in Competition
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 1, Page: e52582
2013
- 33Citations
- 127Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef24
- Captures127
- Readers127
- 127
Article Description
Dominance contests are recurrent and widespread causes of stress among mammals. Studies of activation of the stress axis in social defeat - as reflected in levels of adrenal glucocorticoid, cortisol - have generated scattered and sometimes contradictory results, suggesting that biopsychological individual differences might play an important mediating role, at least in humans. In the context of a larger study of the regulation of endocrine responses to competition, we evaluated the notion that mood states, such as self-assurance and hostility, may influence cortisol reactivity to dominance cues via an interplay with baseline testosterone, considered as a potential marker of individual differences in dominance. Seventy healthy male university students (mean age 20.02, range 18-26) provided saliva samples before and after competing for fifteen minutes on a rigged computer task. After a winner was determined, all participants were assessed on their mood states through a standardized psychometric instrument (PANAS-X). Among winners of a rigged videogame competition, we found a significant interaction between testosterone and self-assurance in relation to post-competition cortisol. Specifically, self-assurance was associated with lower post-competition cortisol in subjects with high baseline testosterone levels, but no such relationship was observed in subjects with lower baseline testosterone levels. In losers of the competition no interaction effect between basal testosterone and hostility was observed. However, in this subgroup a significant negative relationship between basal testosterone and post-competition cortisol was evident. Overall, these findings provide initial support for the novel hypothesis that biological motivational predispositions (i.e. basal testosterone) and state (i.e. mood changes) may interact in regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation after a social contest. © 2013 Zilioli, Watson.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0052582; 10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872256569&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326343; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052582; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052582&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0052582; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052582; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0052582; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052582&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know