Window Area and Development Drive Spatial Variation in Bird-Window Collisions in an Urban Landscape
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 1, Page: e53371
2013
- 74Citations
- 144Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations74
- Citation Indexes68
- 68
- CrossRef35
- Policy Citations6
- Policy Citation6
- Captures144
- Readers144
- 144
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
Collisions with windows are an important human-related threat to birds in urban landscapes. However, the proximate drivers of collisions are not well understood, and no study has examined spatial variation in mortality in an urban setting. We hypothesized that the number of fatalities at buildings varies with window area and habitat features that influence avian community structure. In 2010 we documented bird-window collisions (BWCs) and characterized avian community structure at 20 buildings in an urban landscape in northwestern Illinois, USA. For each building and season, we conducted 21 daily surveys for carcasses and nine point count surveys to estimate relative abundance, richness, and diversity. Our sampling design was informed by experimentally estimated carcass persistence times and detection probabilities. We used linear and generalized linear mixed models to evaluate how habitat features influenced community structure and how mortality was affected by window area and factors that correlated with community structure. The most-supported model was consistent for all community indices and included effects of season, development, and distance to vegetated lots. BWCs were related positively to window area and negatively to development. We documented mortalities for 16/72 (22%) species (34 total carcasses) recorded at buildings, and BWCs were greater for juveniles than adults. Based on the most-supported model of BWCs, the median number of annual predicted fatalities at study buildings was 3 (range = 0-52). These results suggest that patchily distributed environmental resources and levels of window area in buildings create spatial variation in BWCs within and among urban areas. Current mortality estimates place little emphasis on spatial variation, which precludes a fundamental understanding of the issue. To focus conservation efforts, we illustrate how knowledge of the structural and environmental factors that influence bird-window collisions can be used to predict fatalities in the broader landscape. © 2013 Hager et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0053371; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872250466&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326420; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0053371; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053371; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053371.g004
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know