A Unique Box in 28S rRNA Is Shared by the Enigmatic Insect Order Zoraptera and Dictyoptera
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 1, Page: e53679
2013
- 32Citations
- 34Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations32
- Citation Indexes32
- 32
- CrossRef25
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
- Mentions3
- References3
- Wikipedia3
Article Description
The position of the Zoraptera remains one of the most challenging and uncertain concerns in ordinal-level phylogenies of the insects. Zoraptera have been viewed as having a close relationship with five different groups of Polyneoptera, or as being allied to the Paraneoptera or even Holometabola. Although rDNAs have been widely used in phylogenetic studies of insects, the application of the complete 28S rDNA are still scattered in only a few orders. In this study, a secondary structure model of the complete 28S rRNAs of insects was reconstructed based on all orders of Insecta. It was found that one length-variable region, D3-4, is particularly distinctive. The length and/or sequence of D3-4 is conservative within each order of Polyneoptera, but it can be divided into two types between the different orders of the supercohort, of which the enigmatic order Zoraptera and Dictyoptera share one type, while the remaining orders of Polyneoptera share the other. Additionally, independent evidence from phylogenetic results support the clade (Zoraptera+Dictyoptera) as well. Thus, the similarity of D3-4 between Zoraptera and Dictyoptera can serve as potentially valuable autapomorphy or synapomorphy in phylogeny reconstruction. The clades of (Plecoptera+Dermaptera) and ((Grylloblattodea+Mantophasmatodea)+(Embiodea+Phasmatodea)) were also recovered in the phylogenetic study. In addition, considering the other studies based on rDNAs, this study reached the highest congruence with previous phylogenetic studies of Holometabola based on nuclear protein coding genes or morphology characters. Future comparative studies of secondary structures across deep divergences and additional taxa are likely to reveal conserved patterns, structures and motifs that can provide support for major phylogenetic lineages. © 2013 Wang et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0053679; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871865717&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301099; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0053679; http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0053679; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053679; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053679.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know