Transcriptomic Immune Response of Tenebrio molitor Pupae to Parasitization by Scleroderma guani
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 1, Page: e54411
2013
- 59Citations
- 76Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations59
- Citation Indexes59
- 59
- CrossRef38
- Captures76
- Readers76
- 76
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Comparative Mitgenome Analysis of Anoplophora horsfieldi and Other Chrysomeloidea, Cucujiformia Insects Reveals Conserved Mitogenome Organization and Phylogeny.
Byline: Haifen Qin, Yujia Liu, Yujie Zhang, Jingfeng Liu, Zhenkun Zhao and Lichun Jiang Key words Anoplophora horsfieldi, Coleoptera, Cucujiformia, Chrysomeloidea, mitochondrial genome, molecular phylogeny
Article Description
Background: Host and parasitoid interaction is one of the most fascinating relationships of insects, which is currently receiving an increasing interest. Understanding the mechanisms evolved by the parasitoids to evade or suppress the host immune system is important for dissecting this interaction, while it was still poorly known. In order to gain insight into the immune response of Tenebrio molitor to parasitization by Scleroderma guani, the transcriptome of T. molitor pupae was sequenced with focus on immune-related gene, and the non-parasitized and parasitized T. molitor pupae were analyzed by digital gene expression (DGE) analysis with special emphasis on parasitoid-induced immune-related genes using Illumina sequencing. Methodology/Principal Findings: In a single run, 264,698 raw reads were obtained. De novo assembly generated 71,514 unigenes with mean length of 424 bp. Of those unigenes, 37,373 (52.26%) showed similarity to the known proteins in the NCBI nr database. Via analysis of the transcriptome data in depth, 430 unigenes related to immunity were identified. DGE analysis revealed that parasitization by S. guani had considerable impacts on the transcriptome profile of T. molitor pupae, as indicated by the significant up- or down-regulation of 3,431 parasitism-responsive transcripts. The expression of a total of 74 unigenes involved in immune response of T. molitor was significantly altered after parasitization. Conclusions/Significance: obtained T. molitor transcriptome, in addition to establishing a fundamental resource for further research on functional genomics, has allowed the discovery of a large group of immune genes that might provide a meaningful framework to better understand the immune response in this species and other beetles. The DGE profiling data provides comprehensive T. molitor immune gene expression information at the transcriptional level following parasitization, and sheds valuable light on the molecular understanding of the host-parasitoid interaction. © 2013 Zhu et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0054411; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872316251&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23342153; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0054411; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054411&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054411.g007
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know