The Impact of Media Reporting on the Emergence of Charcoal Burning Suicide in Taiwan
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 1, Page: e55000
2013
- 50Citations
- 35Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef35
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti3
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
We investigated the association of the intensity of newspaper reporting of charcoal burning suicide with the incidence of such deaths in Taiwan during 1998-2002. A counting process approach was used to estimate the incidence of suicides and intensity of news reporting. Conditional Poisson generalized linear autoregressive models were performed to assess the association of the intensity of newspaper reporting of charcoal burning and non-charcoal burning suicides with the actual number of charcoal burning and non-charcoal burning suicides the following day. We found that increases in the reporting of charcoal burning suicide were associated with increases in the incidence of charcoal burning suicide on the following day, with each reported charcoal burning news item being associated with a 16% increase in next day charcoal burning suicide (p<.0001). However, the reporting of other methods of suicide was not related to their incidence. We conclude that extensive media reporting of charcoal burning suicides appears to have contributed to the rapid rise in the incidence of the novel method in Taiwan during the initial stage of the suicide epidemic. Regulating media reporting of novel suicide methods may prevent an epidemic spread of such new methods. © 2013 Chen et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0055000; 10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873880239&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383027; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055000; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055000&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0055000; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0055000; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055000&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055000
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know