Effects of Culling on Mesopredator Population Dynamics
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: e58982
2013
- 25Citations
- 97Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef22
- Captures97
- Readers97
- 97
Article Description
Anthropogenic changes in land use and the extirpation of apex predators have facilitated explosive growth of mesopredator populations. Consequently, many species have been subjected to extensive control throughout portions of their range due to their integral role as generalist predators and reservoirs of zoonotic disease. Yet, few studies have monitored the effects of landscape composition or configuration on the demographic or behavioral response of mesopredators to population manipulation. During 2007 we removed 382 raccoons (Procyon lotor) from 30 forest patches throughout a fragmented agricultural ecosystem to test hypotheses regarding the effects of habitat isolation on population recovery and role of range expansion and dispersal in patch colonization of mesopredators in heterogeneous landscapes. Patches were allowed to recolonize naturally and demographic restructuring of patches was monitored from 2008-2010 using mark-recapture. An additional 25 control patches were monitored as a baseline measure of demography. After 3 years only 40% of experimental patches had returned to pre-removal densities. This stagnant recovery was driven by low colonization rates of females, resulting in little to no within-patch recruitment. Colonizing raccoons were predominantly young males, suggesting that dispersal, rather than range expansion, was the primary mechanism driving population recovery. Contrary to our prediction, neither landscape connectivity nor measured local habitat attributes influenced colonization rates, likely due to the high dispersal capability of raccoons and limited role of range expansion in patch colonization. Although culling is commonly used to control local populations of many mesopredators, we demonstrate that such practices create severe disruptions in population demography that may be counterproductive to disease management in fragmented landscapes due to an influx of dispersing males into depopulated areas. However, given the slow repopulation rates observed in our study, localized depopulation may be effective at reducing negative ecological impacts of mesopredators in fragmented landscapes at limited spatial and temporal scales. © 2013 Beasley et al.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84875126657&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23527065; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058982; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058982&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058982; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058982&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058982; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058982.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know