Do Changes in the Pace of Events Affect One-Off Judgments of Duration?
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: e59847
2013
- 8Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef6
- Captures37
- Readers37
- 37
Article Description
Five experiments examined whether changes in the pace of external events influence people's judgments of duration. In Experiments 1a-1c, participants heard pieces of music whose tempo accelerated, decelerated, or remained constant. In Experiment 2, participants completed a visuo-motor task in which the rate of stimulus presentation accelerated, decelerated, or remained constant. In Experiment 3, participants completed a reading task in which facts appeared on-screen at accelerating, decelerating, or constant rates. In all experiments, the physical duration of the to-be-judged interval was the same across conditions. We found no significant effects of temporal structure on duration judgments in any of the experiments, either when participants knew that a time estimate would be required (prospective judgments) or when they did not (retrospective judgments). These results provide a starting point for the investigation of how temporal structure affects one-off judgments of duration like those typically made in natural settings. © 2013 Darlow et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0059847; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84875534360&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555804; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0059847&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059847; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0059847
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know