Isolation and Characterization of Antimicrobial Compounds in Plant Extracts against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 4, Page: e61594
2013
- 97Citations
- 177Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations97
- Citation Indexes97
- 97
- CrossRef50
- Captures177
- Readers177
- 177
- Mentions4
- References4
- Wikipedia4
Article Description
The number of fully active antibiotic options that treat nosocomial infections due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) is extremely limited. Magnolia officinalis, Mahonia bealei, Rabdosia rubescens, Rosa rugosa, Rubus chingii, Scutellaria baicalensis, and Terminalia chebula plant extracts were previously shown to have growth inhibitory activity against a multidrug-resistant clinical strain of A. baumannii. In this study, the compounds responsible for their antimicrobial activity were identified by fractionating each plant extract using high performance liquid chromatography, and determining the antimicrobial activity of each fraction against A. baumannii. The chemical structures of the fractions inhibiting >40% of the bacterial growth were elucidated by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The six most active compounds were identified as: ellagic acid in Rosa rugosa; norwogonin in Scutellaria baicalensis; and chebulagic acid, chebulinic acid, corilagin, and terchebulin in Terminalia chebula. The most potent compound was identified as norwogonin with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 128 μg/mL, and minimum bactericidal concentration of 256 μg/mL against clinically relevant strains of A. baumannii. Combination studies of norwogonin with ten anti-Gram negative bacterial agents demonstrated that norwogonin did not enhance the antimicrobial activity of the synthetic antibiotics chosen for this study. In conclusion, of all identified antimicrobial compounds, norwogonin was the most potent against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii strains. Further studies are warranted to ascertain the prophylactic and therapeutic potential of norwogonin for infections due to multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. © 2013 Miyasaki et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0061594; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84876453756&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630600; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061594; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061594; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061594&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0061594; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594.g003; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0061594; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061594&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know