Effects of Tai Chi in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Preliminary Evidence
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 4, Page: e61806
2013
- 60Citations
- 114Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations60
- Citation Indexes59
- 59
- CrossRef25
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti3
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures114
- Readers114
- 114
Article Description
Background:Currently, several studies assessed the role of Tai Chi (TC) in management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but these studies have wide variation of sample and convey inconclusive results. We therefore undertook a meta-analysis to assess the effects of TC.Methods:A computerized search through electronic databases was performed to obtain sample studies. The primary outcomes were 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and dyspnea. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life and pre-bronchodilator spirometry. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with the I test. A random-effects meta-analysis model was applied.Results:Eight randomized controlled trials involving 544 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled WMDs were 34.22 m (95% CI 21.25-47.20, P<0.00001) for 6 MWD, -0.86 units (95% CI -1.44--0.28, P = 0.004) for dyspnea, 70 ml (95% CI 0.02-0.13, P = 0.01) for FEV, 120 ml (95% CI 0.00-0.23, P = 0.04) for FVC. TC significantly improved the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire total score, and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score except impact score.Conclusions:Findings suggest that TC may provide an effective alternative means to achieve results similar to those reported following participation in pulmonary rehabilitation programs. Further studies are needed to substantiate the preliminary findings and investigate the long-term effects of TC. © 2013 Yan et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0061806; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84876515931&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23626732; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061806&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0061806; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061806.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know