Identification and Characterization of Pheromone Receptors and Interplay between Receptors and Pheromone Binding Proteins in the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xyllostella
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 4, Page: e62098
2013
- 100Citations
- 55Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations100
- Citation Indexes100
- 100
- CrossRef75
- Captures55
- Readers55
- 55
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Response to enantiomers of (Z3Z9)-6,7-epoxy-octadecadiene, sex pheromone component of Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): electroantennagram test, field trapping, and in silico study.
The tea geometric!, Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) is a serious defoliator of tea bushes, Camellia sinensis L. (Theaceae), in southeastern China. Outbreak populations of
Article Description
Moths depend on olfactory cues such as sex pheromones to find and recognize mating partners. Pheromone receptors (PRs) and Pheromone binding proteins (PBPs) are thought to be associated with olfactory signal transduction of pheromonal compounds in peripheral olfactory reception. Here six candidate pheromone receptor genes in the diamondback moth, Plutella xyllostella were identified and cloned. All of the six candidate PR genes display male-biased expression, which is a typical characteristic of pheromone receptors. In the Xenopus-based functional study and in situ hybridization, PxylOR4 is defined as another pheromone receptor in addition to the previously characterized PxylOR1. In the study of interaction between PRs and PBPs, PxylPBPs could increase the sensitivity of the complex expressing oocyte cells to the ligand pheromone component while decreasing the sensitivity to pheromone analogs. We deduce that activating pheromone receptors in olfactory receptor neurons requires some role of PBPs to pheromone/PBP complex. If the chemical signal is not the pheromone component, but instead, a pheromone analog with a similar structure, the complex would have a decreased ability to activate downstream pheromone receptors. © 2013 Sun et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0062098; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g008; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84876562423&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23626773; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g008; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g008; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g007; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g008; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062098&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0062098; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062098.t001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know