Uptake of Preventive Treatment for Intestinal Schistosomiasis among School Children in Jinja District, Uganda: A Cross Sectional Study
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 5, Page: e63438
2013
- 50Citations
- 106Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef29
- Captures106
- Readers106
- 106
Article Description
Background:In Uganda, the current national health sector strategic and investment plan underscores schistosomiasis as one of the diseases targeted for elimination by the year 2015. However, uptake of treatment among school children is unknown but suspected to be low. We estimated the uptake and predictors of preventive treatment with praziquantel.Methods:In a cross sectional study carried out in Jinja district of Uganda, a random sample of 1,010 children in 12 primary schools was questioned about their uptake of praziquantel, knowledge and perceptions about schistosomiasis, support for taking preventive treatment and the dangers of taking praziquantel. The prevalence and mean intensity of infection with Schistosoma mansoni were determined.Results:Self reported uptake of praziquantel at last mass treatment was 28.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 22.9%-33.6%). Overall prevalence and mean intensity of S. mansoni infection was 35% (95% CI: 25.4%-37.9%) and 116.1 eggs per gram (epg) of stool (95% CI: 98.3-137.1) respectively. Uptake of praziquantel was more likely if a child was from a school with high prevalence of infection, had knowledge about schistosomiasis transmission and prevention, and reported teachers' support to take praziquantel. Of the 285 children who took praziquantel, 142 (49.8%) developed side effects. Of the 725 children who did not take the drug, 522 (72.0%) reported fear of side effects as a major reason for non-uptake.Conclusions:Uptake of praziquantel in this population is very low. Fear of side effects of praziquantel, lack of knowledge about schistosomiasis transmission and prevention and lack of teacher support are some of the major factors associated with low uptake. © 2013 Muhumuza et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0063438; 10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877108220&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667617; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063438; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063438; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063438&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0063438; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0063438; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063438&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know