Estimating Bat and Bird Mortality Occurring at Wind Energy Turbines from Covariates and Carcass Searches Using Mixture Models
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 7, Page: e67997
2013
- 67Citations
- 240Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations67
- Citation Indexes52
- 52
- CrossRef49
- Policy Citations15
- Policy Citation15
- Captures240
- Readers240
- 240
Article Description
Environmental impacts of wind energy facilities increasingly cause concern, a central issue being bats and birds killed by rotor blades. Two approaches have been employed to assess collision rates: carcass searches and surveys of animals prone to collisions. Carcass searches can provide an estimate for the actual number of animals being killed but they offer little information on the relation between collision rates and, for example, weather parameters due to the time of death not being precisely known. In contrast, a density index of animals exposed to collision is sufficient to analyse the parameters influencing the collision rate. However, quantification of the collision rate from animal density indices (e.g. acoustic bat activity or bird migration traffic rates) remains difficult. We combine carcass search data with animal density indices in a mixture model to investigate collision rates. In a simulation study we show that the collision rates estimated by our model were at least as precise as conventional estimates based solely on carcass search data. Furthermore, if certain conditions are met, the model can be used to predict the collision rate from density indices alone, without data from carcass searches. This can reduce the time and effort required to estimate collision rates. We applied the model to bat carcass search data obtained at 30 wind turbines in 15 wind facilities in Germany. We used acoustic bat activity and wind speed as predictors for the collision rate. The model estimates correlated well with conventional estimators. Our model can be used to predict the average collision rate. It enables an analysis of the effect of parameters such as rotor diameter or turbine type on the collision rate. The model can also be used in turbine-specific curtailment algorithms that predict the collision rate and reduce this rate with a minimal loss of energy production. © 2013 Korner-Nievergelt et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0067997; 10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84879741341&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23844144; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0067997; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067997&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067997.t002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know