Local Delivery of Polarized Macrophages Improves Reperfusion Recovery in a Mouse Hind Limb Ischemia Model
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 7, Page: e68811
2013
- 41Citations
- 72Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations41
- Citation Indexes41
- 41
- CrossRef14
- Captures72
- Readers72
- 72
Article Description
Aims:Enhancement of collateral development in coronary or peripheral artery disease is a therapeutic target, but it has proven difficult to achieve. Macrophages are key players in collateral remodeling, yet the effect of different macrophage subsets on arteriogenesis has not been investigated.Methods and Results:Murine macrophages were cultured from bone marrow and polarized into M1 (IFNγ), M2a (IL-4) or M2c (IL-10) subsets. C57BL/6 mice underwent femoral artery ligation followed by intramuscular injection of macrophage subsets. Using eGFP expressing macrophages, cells could be detected at least 6 days after ligation and were located in the perivascular space of collateral vessels. After 14 days, perfusion ratio was increased in animals treated with M1 as well as M2a and M2c macrophages compared to control. Depletion of circulating monocytes by clodronate liposome injections did not hamper reperfusion recovery, however, treatment with exogenous polarized macrophages improved perfusion ratio after 14 days again. We used IL10R/LysMCre mice to study the effect of inhibition of endogenous polarization towards specifically M2c macrophages on arteriogenesis. Deletion of the IL10-receptor (IL10R) in the myeloid lineage did not affect reperfusion recovery, yet the pro-arteriogenic effect of exogenously injected M2c macrophages was still present.Conclusions:Local injection of polarized macrophages promotes reperfusion recovery after femoral artery ligation and is not influenced by depletion of circulatory monocytes. Preventing endogenous M2c polarization did not affect reperfusion recovery suggesting that M2c's are not required for collateralization, but are sufficient to induce collateral formation upon exogenous administration. This is the first study using local injection of macrophage subsets showing the pro-arteriogenic effect of polarized macrophages. © 2013 Jetten et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0068811; 10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880793036&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23894348; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068811&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068811; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23894348; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3722193; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068811.g003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know