Opposite effect of mast cell stabilizers ketotifen and tranilast on the vasoconstrictor response to electrical field stimulation in rat mesenteric artery
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 8, Page: e73232
2013
- 10Citations
- 11Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef6
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
Objectives: We analyzed whether mast cell stabilization by either ketotifen or tranilast could alter either sympathetic or nitrergic innervation function in rat mesenteric arteries. Methods: Electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced contraction was analyzed in mesenteric segments from 6-month-old Wistar rats in three experimental groups: control, 3-hour ketotifen incubated (0.1 αmol/L), and 3-hour tranilast incubated (0.1 mmol/L). To assess the possible participation of nitrergic or sympathetic innervation, EFS contraction was analyzed in the presence of non-selective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NAME (0.1 mmol/L), α-adrenergic receptor antagonist phentolamine (0.1 μ mol/L), or the neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA, 1.46 mmol/L) Nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide anion (O2-) levels were measured, as were vasomotor responses to noradrenaline (NA) and to NO donor DEA-NO, in the presence and absence of 0.1 mmol/L tempol. Phosphorylated neuronal NOS (P-nNOS) expression was also analyzed Results: EFS-induced contraction was increased by ketotifen and decreased by tranilast. L-NAME increased the vasoconstrictor response to EFS only in control segments. The vasodilator response to DEA-NO was higher in ketotifen- and tranilast-incubated segments, while tempol increased vasodilator response to DEA-NO only in control segments. Both NO and O2- release, and P-nNOS expression were diminished by ketotifen and by tranilast treatment. The decrease in EFS-induced contraction produced by phentolamine was lower in tranilast-incubated segments. NA vasomotor response was decreased only by tranilast. The remnant vasoconstriction observed in control and ketotifen-incubated segments was abolished by 6-OHDA Conclusion: While both ketotifen and tranilast diminish nitrergic innervation function, only tranilast diminishes sympathetic innnervation function, thus they alter the vasoconstrictor response to EFS in opposing manners.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0073232; 10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903755730&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977380; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073232; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0073232; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232.g006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know