Golgi enrichment and proteomic analysis of developing Pinus radiata xylem by free-flow electrophoresis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 12, Page: e84669
2013
- 9Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef8
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Article Description
Our understanding of the contribution of Golgi proteins to cell wall and wood formation in any woody plant species is limited. Currently, little Golgi proteomics data exists for wood-forming tissues. In this study, we attempted to address this issue by generating and analyzing Golgi-enriched membrane preparations from developing xylem of compression wood from the conifer Pinus radiata. Developing xylem samples from 3-year-old pine trees were harvested for this purpose at a time of active growth and subjected to a combination of density centrifugation followed by free flow electrophoresis, a surface charge separation technique used in the enrichment of Golgi membranes. This combination of techniques was successful in achieving an approximately 200-fold increase in the activity of the Golgi marker galactan synthase and represents a significant improvement for proteomic analyses of the Golgi from conifers. A total of thirty known Golgi proteins were identified by mass spectrometry including glycosyltransferases from gene families involved in glucomannan and glucuronoxylan biosynthesis. The free flow electrophoresis fractions of enriched Golgi were highly abundant in structural proteins (actin and tubulin) indicating a role for the cytoskeleton during compression wood formation. The mass spectrometry proteomics data associated with this study have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000557.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84891286097&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24416096; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084669; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0084669; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084669&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084669; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084669&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084669.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know