TFIIB-related factor 2 over expression is a prognosis marker for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer correlated with tumor angiogenesis
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 2, Page: e88032
2014
- 22Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef10
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Background: The aim of this study was to examine BRF2 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and explore the relationship of BRF2 protein with clinicopathologic factors, tumor angiogenesis and prognosis. Methods: Both BRF2 protein and intratumoral microvessels were examined by immunohistochemical staining in 107 non-small cell lung cancer patients. Intratumoral m icrovessel density (MVD) was measured by counting CD-34 positive immunostained endothelial cells. Western blot and RT-PCR analyses were utilized to investigate the BRF2 expression status in tissues Results: A notably higher level of BRF2 expression was found in NSCLC tissues at protein levels. In addition, univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that BRF2 protein over-expression and high MVD were significantly associated with tumor relapse. Although BRF2 overexpression and high MVD indicated poor 5-year overall survival (p = 0.004 and p = 0.019, respectively), multivariate analysis demonstrated that only BRF2 overexpression was an independent prognostic factor for unfavorable overall survival (P = 0.021). Conclusions: BRF2 is a promising biomarker to identify individuals with poor prognostic potential and a possible target for anti-angiogenic therapy for patients with early-stage NSCLC. © 2014 Lu et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0088032; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84895748013&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24523874; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0088032; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032.t004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0088032; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088032&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know