Reproductive tract tumours: The scourge of woman reproduction ails Indian Rhinoceroses
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 3, Page: e92595
2014
- 24Citations
- 40Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef20
- Captures40
- Readers40
- 40
Article Description
In Indian rhinoceros, extensive leiomyoma, a benign smooth muscle tumour, was sporadically diagnosed post mortem and commonly thought of as contributing factor for reduced fecundity of this species in captivity. However, to date, the prevalence of reproductive tract tumours and their relevance for fecundity are unknown. Our analysis of the international studbook now reveals that females cease reproducing at the age of 18.1±1.2 years; equivalent to a reproductive lifespan of just 9.5±1.3 years. This short reproductive life is in sharp contrast to their longevity in captivity of over 40 years. Here we show, after examining 42% of the captive female population, that age-related genital tract tumours are highly prevalent in this endangered species. Growth and development of these tumours was found to be age-related, starting from the age of 10 years. All females older than 12 years had developed genital tumours, just 7-9 years past maturity. Tumour sizes ranged from 1.5-10 cm. With age, tumours became more numerous, sometimes merging into one large diffuse tumour mass. These tumours, primarily vaginal and cervical, presumably cause widespread young-age infertility by the age of 18 years. In few cases, tumour necrosis suggested possible malignancy of tumours. Possible consequences of such genital tract tumour infestation are hindered intromission, pain during mating, hampered sperm passage, risk of ascending infection during pregnancy, dystocia, or chronic vaginal bleeding. In humans, leiomyoma affect up to 80% of pre-menopause women. While a leading cause for infertility, pregnancy is known to reduce the risk of tumour development. However, different from human, surgical intervention is not a viable treatment option in rhinoceroses. Thus, in analogy to humans, we suggest early onset and seamless consecutive pregnancies to help reduce prevalence of this disease, better maintain a self-sustained captive population and improve animal welfare. © 2014 Hermes et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0092595; 10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84899903655&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24671211; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092595&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0092595; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092595.t004
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know