Relaxin does not improve angiotensin II-induced target-organ damage
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 4, Page: e93743
2014
- 9Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef6
- Captures27
- Readers27
- 27
Article Description
Relaxin is a corpus-luteum produced protein hormone with vasodilatatory, anti-fibrotic, and angiogenic properties that are opposite to angiotensin (Ang) II. We investigated whether or not relaxin ameliorates Ang II-induced target-organ damage. We used double transgenic rats harboring both human renin and angiotensinogen genes (dTGR) that develop severe hypertension, target-organ damage, and die untreated within 7-8 weeks. Recombinant relaxin at a low (26 μg/kg/d) and a high dose (240 μg/kg/d) was given to 4 week-old dTGR and age-matched Sprague-Dawley rats (SD). Systolic blood pressure increased progressively in untreated dTGRs from 162±3 mmHg at week 5 to 225±5 mmHg at week 7. Relaxin had no effect on blood pressure whereas SD rats were normotensive (106±1 mmHg). Untreated and relaxin-treated dTGR had similarly severe cardiac hypertrophy indices. Relaxin did not ameliorate albuminuria and did not prevent matrix-protein deposition in the heart and kidney in dTGR. Finally, relaxin treatment did not reduce mortality. These data suggest that pharmacological doses of relaxin do not reverse severe effects of Ang II. © 2014 Haase et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0093743; 10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84899460877&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710077; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g006; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093743&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0093743; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093743.g003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know