Genome-wide comparative analysis of 20 miniature inverted-repeat transposable element families in Brassica rapa and B. oleracea
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 4, Page: e94499
2014
- 33Citations
- 47Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef20
- Captures47
- Readers47
- 47
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) are ubiquitous, non-autonomous class II transposable elements. Here, we conducted genome-wide comparative analysis of 20 MITE families in B. rapa, B. oleracea, and Arabidopsis thaliana. A total of 5894 and 6026 MITE members belonging to the 20 families were found in the whole genome pseudochromosome sequences of B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively. Meanwhile, only four of the 20 families, comprising 573 members, were identified in the Arabidopsis genome, indicating that most of the families were activated in the Brassica genus after divergence from Arabidopsis . Copy numbers varied from 4 to 1459 for each MITE family, and there was up to 6- fold variation between B. rapa and B. oleracea. In particular, analysis of intact members showed that whereas eleven families were present in similar copy numbers in B. rapa and B. oleracea, nine families showed copy number variation ranging from 2- to 16-fold. Four of those families (BraSto-3, BraTo-3, 4, 5) were more abundant in B. rapa, and the other five (BraSto-1, BraSto-4, BraTo-1, 7 and BraHAT-1) were more abundant in B. oleracea. Overall, 54% and 51% of the MITEs resided in or within 2 kb of a gene in the B. rapa and B. oleracea genomes, respectively. Notably, 92 MITEs were found within the CDS of annotated genes, suggesting that MITEs might play roles in diversification of genes in the recently triplicated Brassica genome. MITE insertion polymorphism (MIP) analysis of 289 MITE members showed that 52% and 23% were polymorphic at the inter- and intra-species levels, respectively, indicating that there has been recent MITE activity in the Brassica genome. These recently activated MITE families with abundant MIP will provide useful resources for molecular breeding and identification of novel functional genes arising from MITE insertion. © 2014 Sampath et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0094499; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84899701665&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24747717; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0094499; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094499; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094499.g006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know