Fish with chips: Tracking reef fish movements to evaluate size and connectivity of Caribbean marine protected areas
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 5, Page: e96028
2014
- 83Citations
- 288Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations83
- Citation Indexes83
- 83
- CrossRef77
- Captures288
- Readers288
- 288
Article Description
Coral reefs and associated fish populations have experienced rapid decline in the Caribbean region and marine protected areas (MPAs) have been widely implemented to address this decline. The performance of no-take MPAs (i.e., marine reserves) for protecting and rebuilding fish populations is influenced by the movement of animals within and across their boundaries. Very little is known about Caribbean reef fish movements creating a critical knowledge gap that can impede effective MPA design, performance and evaluation. Using miniature implanted acoustic transmitters and a fixed acoustic receiver array, we address three key questions: How far can reef fish move? Does connectivity exist between adjacent MPAs? Does existing MPA size match the spatial scale of reef fish movements? We show that many reef fishes are capable of traveling far greater distances and in shorter duration than was previously known. Across the Puerto Rican Shelf, more than half of our 163 tagged fish (18 species of 10 families) moved distances greater than 1 km with three fish moving more than 10 km in a single day and a quarter spending time outside of MPAs. We provide direct evidence of ecological connectivity across a network of MPAs, including estimated movements of more than 40 km connecting a nearshore MPA with a shelf-edge spawning aggregation. Most tagged fish showed high fidelity to MPAs, but also spent time outside MPAs, potentially contributing to spillover. Three-quarters of our fish were capable of traveling distances that would take them beyond the protection offered by at least 40-64% of the existing eastern Caribbean MPAs. We recommend that key species movement patterns be used to inform and evaluate MPA functionality and design, particularly size and shape. A re-scaling of our perception of Caribbean reef fish mobility and habitat use is imperative, with important implications for ecology and management effectiveness. © 2014 Pittman et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0096028; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84900410929&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24797815; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.g001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096028&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096028.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0096028
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know