Preference-based serial decision dynamics: Your first sushi reveals your eating order at the sushi table
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 5, Page: e96653
2014
- 3Citations
- 66Usage
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Usage66
- Downloads45
- Abstract Views21
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Article Description
In everyday life, we regularly choose among multiple items serially such as playing music in a playlist or determining priorities in a to-do list. However, our behavioral strategy to determine the order of choice is poorly understood. Here we defined 'the sushi problem' as how we serially choose multiple items of different degrees of preference when multiple sequences are possible, and no particular order is necessarily better than another, given that all items will eventually be chosen. In the current study, participants selected seven sushi pieces sequentially at the lunch table, and we examined the relationship between eating order and preference. We found two dominant selection strategies, with one group selecting in order from most to least preferred, and the other doing the opposite, which were significantly different from patterns generated from a random strategy. Interestingly, we found that more females tended to employ the favorite-first rather than favorite-last strategy. These two choice sequences appear to reflect two opposing behavioral strategies that might provide selective advantages in their own right, while also helping to provide solutions to otherwise unconstrained problems. © 2014 Jeong et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0096653; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84901359497&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24846274; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653; https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa/3123; https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4112&context=facoa; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096653; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096653; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096653&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096653&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096653.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0096653
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know