IncA/C plasmid-mediated spread of CMY-2 in multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli from food animals in China
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 5, Page: e96738
2014
- 54Citations
- 82Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations54
- Citation Indexes54
- 54
- CrossRef16
- Captures82
- Readers82
- 82
Article Description
Objectives: To obtain a broad molecular epidemiological characterization of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase CMY-2 in Escherichia coli isolates from food animals in China. Methods: A total of 1083 E. coli isolates from feces, viscera, blood, drinking water, and sub-surface soil were examined for the presence of CMY-2 β-lactamases. CMY-2-producing isolates were characterized as follows: the bla genotype was determined using PCR and sequencing, characterization of the bla genetic environment, plasmid sizing using S1 nuclease pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), PCR-based replicon typing, phylogenetic grouping, XbaI-PFGE, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Results: All 31 CMY-2 producers were only detected in feces, and presented with multidrug resistant phenotypes. All CMY-2 strains also co-harbored genes conferring resistance to other antimicrobials, including extended spectrum β-lactamases genes (bla or bla ), plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants (qnr, oqxA, and aac-(6′)-Ib-cr), floR and rmtB. The co-transferring of bla with qnrS1 and floR (alone and together) was mainly driven by the Inc A/C type plasmid, with sizes of 160 or 200 kb. Gene cassette arrays inserted in the class 1 or class 2 integron were amplified among 12 CMY-2 producers. CMY-2 producers belonged to avirulent groups B1 (n = 12) and A (n = 11), and virulent group D (n = 8). There was a good correlation between phylogenetic groups and sequence types (ST). Twenty-four STs were identified, of which the ST complexes (STC) 101/B1 (n = 6), STC10/A (n = 5), and STC155/B1 (n = 3) were dominant. Conclusions: CMY-2 is the dominant AmpC β-lactamase in food animals and is associated with a transferable replicon IncA/C plasmid in the STC101, STC10, and STC155 strains. © 2014 Guo et al.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84901236154&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24816748; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096738; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096738&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0096738; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096738; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096738&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096738.t001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know