Chinese tobacco industry promotional activity on the microblog Weibo
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 6, Page: e99336
2014
- 11Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef8
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Article Description
Background: Although China ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control [FCTC] in 2005, the partial ban on tobacco advertising does not cover the internet. Weibo is one of the most important social media channels in China, using a format similar to its global counterpart, Twitter. The Weibo homepage is a platform to present products, brands and corporate culture. There is great potential for the tobacco industry to exploit Weibo to promote products. Methods: Seven tobacco industry Weibo accounts that each had more than 5000 fans were selected to examine the content of Weibos established by tobacco companies or their advertising agents. Results: Of the 12073 posts found on the seven accounts, 92.3% (11143) could be classified into six main themes: traditional culture, popular culture, social and business affairs, advertisement, public relations and tobacco culture. Posts under the theme of popular culture accounted for about half of total posts (49%), followed by 'advertisement' and 'tobacco culture' (both at 12%), 'traditional culture' and 'public relations' (both at 11%), and finally 'social and business affairs' (5%). 33% of posts included the words 'cigarette' or 'smoking' and 53% of posts included the tobacco brand name, indicating that tobacco companies carefully construct the topic and content of posts. Conclusions: Weibo is an important new online marketing tool for the Chinese tobacco industry. Tobacco industry use of Weibo to promote brands and normalize smoking subverts China's ratification of the WHO FCTC. Policy to control tobacco promotion needs reforming to address this widespread circumvention of China's tobacco advertising ban. © 2014 Wang et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0099336; 10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902603127&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24914739; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099336; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099336&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099336; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0099336; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099336&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099336.t002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know