Development of a melanoma risk prediction model incorporating MC1R genotype and indoor tanning exposure: Impact of mole phenotype on model performance
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 7, Page: e101507
2014
- 12Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef11
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Article Description
Background: Identifying individuals at increased risk for melanoma could potentially improve public health through targeted surveillance and early detection. Studies have separately demonstrated significant associations between melanoma risk, melanocortin receptor (MC1R) polymorphisms, and indoor ultraviolet light (UV) exposure. Existing melanoma risk prediction models do not include these factors; therefore, we investigated their potential to improve the performance of a risk model. Methods: Using 875 melanoma cases and 765 controls from the population-based Minnesota Skin Health Study we compared the predictive ability of a clinical melanoma risk model (Model A) to an enhanced model (Model F) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Model A used self-reported conventional risk factors including mole phenotype categorized as "none", "few", "some" or "many" moles. Model F added MC1R genotype and measures of indoor and outdoor UV exposure to Model A. We also assessed the predictive ability of these models in subgroups stratified by mole phenotype (e.g. nevus-resistant ("none" and "few" moles) and nevus-prone ("some" and "many" moles)). Results: Model A (the reference model) yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.69, 0.74). Model F was improved with an AUC = 0.74 (95% CI = 0.71-0.76, p<0.01). We also observed substantial variations in the AUCs of Models A & F when examined in the nevus-prone and nevus-resistant subgroups. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that adding genotypic information and environmental exposure data can increase the predictive ability of a clinical melanoma risk model, especially among nevus-prone individuals. © 2014 Penn et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0101507; 10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903973521&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003831; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101507; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0101507; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101507.t006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know