PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators

PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 8, Page: e103733
2014
  • 35
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 100
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 2
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    35
  • Captures
    100
  • Social Media
    2
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      2
      • Facebook
        2

Article Description

It is a classic topic of social network analysis to evaluate the importance of nodes and identify the node that takes on the role of core or bridge in a network. Because a single indicator is not sufficient to analyze multiple characteristics of a node, it is a natural solution to apply multiple indicators that should be selected carefully. An intuitive idea is to select some indicators with weak correlations to efficiently assess different characteristics of a node. However, this paper shows that it is much better to select the indicators with strong correlations. Because indicator correlation is based on the statistical analysis of a large number of nodes, the particularity of an important node will be outlined if its indicator relationship doesn't comply with the statistical correlation. Therefore, the paper selects the multiple indicators including degree, ego-betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality to evaluate the importance and the role of a node. The importance of a node is equal to the normalized sum of its three indicators. A candidate for core or bridge is selected from the great degree nodes or the nodes with great ego-betweenness centrality respectively. Then, the role of a candidate is determined according to the difference between its indicators' relationship with the statistical correlation of the overall network. Based on 18 real networks and 3 kinds of model networks, the experimental results show that the proposed methods perform quite well in evaluating the importance of nodes and in identifying the node role. © 2014 Huang et al.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know