Development of new multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) for Listeria innocua and its application in a food processing plant
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 9, Page: e105803
2014
- 8Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef5
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Listeria innocua is an important hygiene indicator bacterium in food industries because it behaves similar to Listeria monocytogenes, which is pathogenic to humans. PFGE is often used to characterize bacterial strains and to track contamination source. However, because PFGE is an expensive, complicated, time-consuming protocol, and poses difficulty in data sharing, development of a new typing method is necessary. MLVA is a technique that identifies bacterial strains on the basis of the number of tandem repeats present in the genome varies depending on the strains. MLVA has gained attention due to its high reproducibility and ease of data sharing. In this study, we developed a MLVA protocol to assess L. innocua and evaluated it by tracking the contamination source of L. innocua in an actual food manufacturing factory by typing the bacterial strains isolated from the factory. Three VNTR regions of the L. innocua genome were chosen for use in the MLVA. The number of repeat units in each VNTR region was calculated based on the results of PCR product analysis using capillary electrophoresis (CE). The calculated number of repetitions was compared with the results of the gene sequence analysis to demonstrate the accuracy of the CE repeat number analysis. The developed technique was evaluated using 60 L. innocua strains isolated from a food factory. These 60 strains were classified into 11 patterns using MLVA. Many of the strains were classified into ST-6, revealing that this MLVA strain type can contaminate each manufacturing process in the factory. The MLVA protocol developed in this study for L. innocua allowed rapid and easy analysis through the use of CE. This technique was found to be very useful in hygiene control in factories because it allowed us to track contamination sources and provided information regarding whether the bacteria were present in the factories.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84907077060&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25198191; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0105803; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105803.t005
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know