Ultra high content image analysis and phenotype profiling of 3D cultured micro-tissues
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 10, Page: e109688
2014
- 32Citations
- 93Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations32
- Citation Indexes32
- 32
- CrossRef14
- Captures93
- Readers93
- 93
Article Description
In many situations, 3D cell cultures mimic the natural organization of tissues more closely than 2D cultures. Conventional methods for phenotyping such 3D cultures use either single or multiple simple parameters based on morphology and fluorescence staining intensity. However, due to their simplicity many details are not taken into account which limits system-level study of phenotype characteristics. Here, we have developed a new image analysis platform to automatically profile 3D cell phenotypes with 598 parameters including morphology, topology, and texture parameters such as wavelet and image moments. As proof of concept, we analyzed mouse breast cancer cells (4T1 cells) in a 384-well plate format following exposure to a diverse set of compounds at different concentrations. The result showed concentration dependent phenotypic trajectories for different biologically active compounds that could be used to classify compounds based on their biological target. To demonstrate the wider applicability of our method, we analyzed the phenotypes of a collection of 44 human breast cancer cell lines cultured in 3D and showed that our method correctly distinguished basal-A, basal-B, luminal and ERBB2+ cell lines in a supervised nearest neighbor classification method.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; 10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84907766772&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289886; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0109688; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109688; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109688.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know